Versioning

API versioning

API versions appear in the package names of some packages. See the package names documentation for more details of when this occurs.

The stable releases of APIs only have a major version number (e.g. V1, V2). Changes made to these APIs within a major version are always backward-compatible. New functionality is exposed via a new version (typically minor) of the client library package.

When an API is made publicly available while it is not yet stable, that is indicated by a suffix on the version number. If this is a prerelease of a new major version of the API, it is indicated just by the major version number and a "BetaX" suffix, e.g. Google.Cloud.ErrorReporting.V1Beta1. If it is a prerelease for a minor update to an existing GA API, this is indicated with both the point release number and the beta revision of that point release. For example Google.Cloud.Vision.V1P1Beta1 is the first beta for the first point release of the Vision V1 API.

Package versioning

Packages follow Semantic Versioning - which sounds simpler than it really is, due to the difficulty of determining exactly what counts as a breaking change. The rules for what would count as a breaking change are difficult to document exhaustively, but the general thrust is described below.

Major versions

Code which compiles against version 1.0 may not compile against version 2.0, and if it does, it may no longer work the same way. Likewise, existing packages with a dependency on version 1.0 may not work when version 2.0 is present at execution time.

Examples of changes which provoke a new major version:

  • Updating a dependency to a new major version
  • Adding a new dependency1
  • Removing or renaming any publicly-accessible API surface member. (This includes renaming parameters.)

1 One exception here is when the dependency is to a brand new package. The reason that introducing a new dependency introduces a new major version is that existing code may have a dependency on a different major version of the same package. While this exception violates very strict semantic versioning, it relieves the inconvenience of introducing new major versions, with very little risk of causing problems. Similarly, a new dependency on a system package (e.g. System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions) can be introduced without provoking a new major version. Both of these would cause a minor version bump instead.

Minor versions

Code which compiles aginst version 1.0 should compile against version 1.1, with the exception of code which compiles but would never work at execution time1. Likewise, existing packages with a dependency on version 1.0 should work when version 1.1 is present at execution time.

Examples of changes which provoke a new minor version:

  • Updating a dependency to a new minor version
  • Adding new functionality via new types and type members
  • Adding new enum values

1 This exemption makes it easier to add overloads. A call to Foo(null) can become ambiguous if an overload is added, but if such code would always have caused an ArgumentNullException anyway, we don't view this as a breaking change.

Patch versions

Like minor versions, patch versions are backward-compatible - but additionally, they are forward-compatible: code which compiles against version 1.0.1 should also compile against version 1.0.0. The dependency resolution of .NET is likely to ensure that this compatibility is never exposed for packages (so a package with a dependency on version 1.0.1 will never have to execute in an environment where only 1.0.0 is present), but if that does occur, that code should work too, unless it relies on the behavioral fixes between the two patch versions.

Examples of changes which provoke a new minor version:

  • Updating a dependency to a new patch version
  • Purely internal bug fixes with no change to the exposed API