You can use the best practices listed here as a quick reference of what to keep in mind when building an application that uses Firestore in Datastore mode. If you are just starting out with Datastore mode, this page might not be the best place to start, because it does not teach you the basics of how to use Datastore mode. If you are a new user, we suggest that you start with Getting Started with Firestore in Datastore mode.
- Always use UTF-8 characters for namespace names, kind names, property names, and custom key names. Non-UTF-8 characters used in these names can interfere with Datastore mode functionality. For example, a non-UTF-8 character in a property name can prevent creation of an index that uses the property.
- Do not use a forward slash (
/) in kind names or custom key names. Forward slashes in these names could interfere with future functionality.
- Avoid storing sensitive information in a Cloud Project ID. A Cloud Project ID might be retained beyond the life of your project.
- Use batch operations for your reads, writes, and deletes instead of single operations. Batch operations are more efficient because they perform multiple operations with the same overhead as a single operation.
- If a transaction fails, ensure you try to rollback the transaction. The rollback minimizes retry latency for a different request contending for the same resource(s) in a transaction. Note that a rollback itself might fail, so the rollback should be a best-effort attempt only.
- Use asynchronous calls where available instead of synchronous calls.
Asynchronous calls minimize latency impact. For example, consider an application
that needs the result of a synchronous
lookup()and the results of a query before it can render a response. If the
lookup()and the query do not have a data dependency, there is no need to synchronously wait until the
lookup()completes before initiating the query.
- Avoid writing to an entity more than once per second. Writing at a sustained rate above that limit leads to time outs and results in slower overall performance of your application.
- Do not include the same entity (by key) multiple times in the same commit. Including the same entity multiple times in the same commit could impact latency.
- Key names are autogenerated if not provided at entity creation. They are allocated so as to be evenly distributed in the keyspace.
- For a key that uses a custom name, always use UTF-8 characters except a
forward slash (
/). Non-UTF-8 characters interfere with various processes such as importing a Datastore mode export file into BigQuery. A forward slash could interfere with future functionality.
- For a key that uses a numeric ID:
- Do not use a negative number for the ID. A negative ID could interfere with sorting.
- Do not use the value
0(zero) for the ID. If you do, you will get an automatically allocated ID.
- If you wish to manually assign your own numeric IDs to the entities you
create, have your application obtain a block of IDs with the
allocateIds()method. This will prevent Datastore mode from assigning one of your manual numeric IDs to another entity.
If you assign your own manual numeric ID or custom name to the entities you create, do not use monotonically increasing values such as:
1, 2, 3, …, "Customer1", "Customer2", "Customer3", …. "Product 1", "Product 2", "Product 3", ….
If an application generates large traffic, such sequential numbering could lead to hotspots that impact Datastore mode latency. To avoid the issue of sequential numeric IDs, obtain numeric IDs from the
allocateIds()method generates well-distributed sequences of numeric IDs.
By specifying a key or storing the generated name, you can later perform a
lookup()on that entity without needing to issue a query to find the entity.
- If a property will never be needed for a query, exclude the property from indexes. Unnecessarily indexing a property could result in increased latency and increased storage costs of index entries.
- Avoid having too many composite indexes. Excessive use of composite indexes could result in increased latency and increased storage costs of index entries. If you need to execute ad hoc queries on large datasets without previously defined indexes, use BigQuery.
- Do not index properties with monotonically increasing values (such as a
NOW()timestamp). Maintaining such an index could lead to hotspots that impact Datastore mode latency for applications with high read and write rates. For further guidance on dealing with monotonic properties, see High read/write rates for a narrow key range below.
- Always use UTF-8 characters for properties of type string. A non-UTF-8 character in a property of type string could interfere with queries. If you need to save data with non-UTF-8 characters, use a byte string.
- Do not use dots in property names. Dots in property names interfere with indexing of embedded entity properties.
- If you need to access only the key from query results, use a keys-only query. A keys-only query returns results at lower latency and cost than retrieving entire entities.
- If you need to access only specific properties from an entity, use a projection query. A projection query returns results at lower latency and cost than retrieving entire entities.
- Likewise, if you need to access only the properties that are included in the
query filter (for example, those listed in an
order byclause), use a projection query.
- Do not use offsets. Instead use cursors. Using an offset only avoids returning the skipped entities to your application, but these entities are still retrieved internally. The skipped entities affect the latency of the query, and your application is billed for the read operations required to retrieve them.
Designing for scale
Updates to an entity
A single entity in Datastore mode should not be updated too rapidly.
If you are using Datastore mode, design your application so that it will not need to update an entity more than once per second. If you update an entity too rapidly, then your Datastore mode writes will have higher latency, timeouts, and other types of error. This is known as contention.
Datastore mode write rates to a single entity can sometimes exceed the one per second limit so load tests might not show this problem.
High read/write rates to a narrow key range
Avoid high read or write rates to lexicographically close documents, or your application will experience contention errors. This issue is known as hotspotting, and your application can experience hotspotting if it does any of the following:
Creates new entities at a very high rate and allocates its own monotonically increasing IDs.
Datastore mode allocates keys using a scatter algorithm. You should not encounter hotspotting on writes if you create new entities using automatic entity ID allocation.
Creates new entities at a very high rate using the legacy sequential ID allocation policy.
Creates new entities at a high rate for a kind with few entities.
Creates new entities with an indexed and monotonically increasing property value, like a timestamp, at a very high rate.
Deletes entities from a kind at a high rate.
Writes to the database at a very high rate without gradually increasing traffic.
If you are using Datastore mode, you can get slow writes due to a hotspot if you have a sudden increase in the write rate to a small range of keys. Firestore in Datastore mode will eventually split the key space to support high load.
The limit for reads is typically much higher than for writes, unless you are reading from a single key at a high rate.
Hot spots can apply to key ranges used by both entity keys and indexes.
In some cases, a hotspot can have wider impact to an application than preventing reads or writes to a small range of keys. For example, the hot keys might be read or written during instance startup, causing loading requests to fail.
If you do have a key or indexed property that will be monotonically increasing then you can prepend a random hash to ensure that the keys are sharded onto multiple tablets.
Likewise, if you need to query on a monotonically increasing (or decreasing) property using a sort or filter, you could instead index on a new property, for which you prefix the monotonic value with a value that has high cardinality across the dataset, but is common to all the entities in the scope of the query you want to perform. For instance, if you want to query for entries by timestamp but only need to return results for a single user at a time, you could prefix the timestamp with the user id and index that new property instead. This would still permit queries and ordered results for that user, but the presence of the user id would ensure the index itself is well sharded.
Ramping up traffic
Gradually ramp up traffic to new kinds or portions of the keyspace.
You should ramp up traffic to new kinds gradually in order to give Firestore in Datastore mode sufficient time to prepare for the increased traffic. We recommend a maximum of 500 operations per second to a new kind, then increasing traffic by 50% every 5 minutes. In theory, you can grow to 740K operations per second after 90 minutes using this ramp up schedule. Be sure that writes are distributed relatively evenly throughout the key range. Our SREs call this the "500/50/5" rule.
This pattern of gradual ramp up is particularly important if you change your code to stop using kind A and instead use kind B. A naive way to handle this migration is to change your code to read kind B, and if it does not exist then read kind A. However, this could cause a sudden increase in traffic to a new kind with a very small portion of the keyspace.
The same problem can also occur if you migrate your entities to use a different range of keys within the same kind.
The strategy that you use to migrate entities to a new kind or key will depend on your data model. Below is an example strategy, known as "Parallel Reads". You will need to determine whether or not this strategy is effective for your data. An important consideration will be the cost impact of parallel operations during the migration.
Read from the old entity or key first. If it is missing, then you could read from the new entity or key. A high rate of reads of non-existent entities can lead to hotspotting, so you need to be sure to gradually increase load. A better strategy is to copy the old entity to the new then delete the old. Ramp up parallel reads gradually to ensure that the new key space is well split.
A possible strategy for gradually ramping up reads or writes to a new kind is use a deterministic hash of the user ID to get a random percentage of users that write new entities. Be sure that the result of the user ID hash is not skewed either by your random function or by your user behavior.
Meanwhile, run a Dataflow job to copy all your data from the old entities or keys to the new ones. Your batch job should avoid writes to sequential keys in order to prevent hotspots. When the batch job is complete, you can read only from the new location.
A refinement of this strategy is to migrate small batches of users at one time. Add a field to the user entity which tracks the migration status of that user. Select a batch of users to migrate based on a hash of the user ID. A Mapreduce or Dataflow job will migrate the keys for that batch of users. The users that have an in-progress migration will use parallel reads.
Note that you cannot easily roll back unless you do dual writes of both the old and new entities during the migration phase. This would increase Datastore mode costs incurred.
Avoid deleting large numbers of entities across a small range of keys.
Firestore in Datastore mode periodically rewrites its tables to remove deleted entries, and to reorganize your data so that reads and writes are more efficient. This process is known as a compaction.
If you delete a large number of Datastore mode entities across a small range of keys then queries across this part of the index will be slower until compaction has completed. In extreme cases, your queries might time out before returning results.
It is an anti-pattern to use a timestamp value for an indexed field to represent an entity's expiration time. In order to retrieve expired entities, you would need to query against this indexed field, which likely lies in an overlapping part of the keyspace with index entries for the most recently deleted entities.
You can improve performance with "sharded queries", that prepend a fixed length string to the expiration timestamp. The index is sorted on the full string, so that entities at the same timestamp will be located throughout the key range of the index. You run multiple queries in parallel to fetch results from each shard.
A fuller solution for the expiration timestamp issue is to use a "generation number" which is a global counter that is periodically updated. The generation number is prepended to the expiration timestamp so that queries are sorted by generation number, then shard, then timestamp. Deletion of old entities occurs at a prior generation. Any entity not deleted should have its generation number incremented. Once the deletion is complete, you move forward to the next generation. Queries against an older generation will perform poorly until compaction is complete. You might need to wait for several generations to complete before querying the index to get the list of entities to delete, in order to reduce the risk of missing results due to eventual consistency.
Sharding and replication
Use sharding or replication to deal with hotspots.
You can use replication if you need to read a portion of the key range at a higher rate than Firestore in Datastore mode permits. Using this strategy, you would store N copies of the same entity allowing N times higher rate of reads than supported by a single entity.
You can use sharding if you need to write to a portion of the key range at a higher rate than Firestore in Datastore mode permits. Sharding breaks up an entity into smaller pieces.
Some common mistakes when sharding include:
Sharding using a time prefix. When the time rolls over to the next prefix then the new unsplit portion becomes a hotspot. Instead, you should gradually roll over a portion of your writes to the new prefix.
Sharding just the hottest entities. If you shard a small proportion of the total number of entities then there might not be sufficient rows between the hot entities to ensure that they stay on different splits.